|
Leadership
~
Balancing Task- and People-Oriented Leadership
~
When your boss puts you in charge of
organizing the company Christmas party, what do you do first? Do you develop
a time line and start assigning tasks or do you think about who would prefer
to do what and try to schedule around their needs? When the planning starts
to fall behind schedule, what is your first reaction? Do you chase everyone
to get back on track, or do you ease off a bit recognizing that everyone is
busy just doing his/her job, let alone the extra tasks you've assigned?
Your answers to these types of questions can
reveal a great deal about your personal leadership style.
Some leaders are very task-oriented; they
simply want to get things done. Others are very people-oriented; they want
people to be happy. And others are a combination of the two. If you prefer
to lead by setting and enforcing tight schedules, you tend to be more
production-oriented (or task-oriented). If you make people your priority and
try to accommodate employee needs, then you're more people-oriented.
Neither preference is right or wrong, just as
no one type of leadership style is best for all situations. However, it's
useful to understand what your natural leadership tendencies are, so that
you can then working on developing skills that you may be missing.
A popular framework for thinking about a
leader's 'task versus person' orientation was developed by Robert Blake and
Jane Mouton in the early 1960s. Called the Managerial Grid, or Leadership
Grid, it plots the degree of task-centeredness versus person-centeredness
and identifies five combinations as distinct leadership styles.
Understanding the Model
The Managerial Grid is based on two behavioral
dimensions:
-
Concern for People - This
is the degree to which a leader considers the needs of team members,
their interests, and areas of personal development when deciding how
best to accomplish a task
-
Concern for Production -
This is the degree to which a leader emphasizes concrete objectives,
organizational efficiency and high productivity when deciding how best
to accomplish a task.
Using the axis to plot leadership 'concerns
for production' versus 'concerns for people', Blake and Mouton defined the
following five leadership styles:
Country Club Leadership -
High People/Low Production
This style of leader is most concerned about the needs and feelings of
members of his/her team. These people operate under the assumption that as
long as team members are happy and secure then they will work hard. What
tends to result is a work environment that is very relaxed and fun but where
production suffers due to lack of direction and control.
Produce or Perish Leadership
- High Production/Low People
Also known as Authoritarian or Compliance Leaders, people in this category
believe that employees are simply a means to an end. Employee needs are
always secondary to the need for efficient and productive workplaces. This
type of leader is very autocratic, has strict work rules, policies, and
procedures, and views punishment as the most effective means to motivate
employees.
Impoverished Leadership - Low
Production/ Low People
This leader is mostly ineffective. He/she has neither a high regard for
creating systems for getting the job done, nor for creating a work
environment that is satisfying and motivating. The result is a place of
disorganization, dissatisfaction and disharmony.
Middle-of-the-Road Leadership
- Medium Production/Medium People
This style seems to be a balance of the two competing concerns. It may at
first appear to be an ideal compromise. Therein lies the problem, though:
When you compromise, you necessarily give away a bit of each concern so that
neither production nor people needs are fully met. Leaders who use this
style settle for average performance and often believe that this is the most
anyone can expect.
Team Leadership - High
Production/High People
According to the Blake Mouton model, this is the pinnacle of managerial
style. These leaders stress production needs and the needs of the people
equally highly. The premise here is that employees are involved in
understanding organizational purpose and determining production needs. When
employees are committed to, and have a stake in the organization's success,
their needs and production needs coincide. This creates a team environment
based on trust and respect, which leads to high satisfaction and motivation
and, as a result, high production.
Applying the Blake Mouton Managerial Grid
Being aware of the various approaches is the
first step in understanding and improving how well you perform as a manager.
It is important to understand how you currently operate, so that you can
then identify ways of becoming competent in both realms.
Step One: Identify your leadership
style.
-
Think of some recent situations where you
were the leader.
-
For each of these situations, place
yourself in the grid according to where you believe you fit.
Step Two: Identify areas of
improvement and develop your leadership skills
-
Look at your current leadership method and
critically analyze its effectiveness.
-
Look at ways you can improve. Are you
settling for 'middle of the road' because it is easier than reaching for
more?
-
Identify ways to get the skills you need
to reach the Team Leadership position. These may include involving
others in problem solving or improving how you communicate with them, if
you feel you are too task-oriented. Or it may mean becoming clearer
about scheduling or monitoring project progress if you tend to focus too
much on people.
-
Continually monitor your performance and
watch for situations when you slip back into bad old habits.
Step Three: Put the Grid in Context
It is important to recognize that the Team
Leadership style isn't always the most effective approach in every
situation. While the benefits of democratic and participative management are
universally accepted, there are times that call for more attention in one
area than another. If your company is in the midst of a merger or some other
significant change, it is often acceptable to place a higher emphasis on
people than on production. Likewise, when faced with an economic hardship or
physical risk, people concerns may be placed on the back burner, for the
short-term at least, to achieve high productivity and efficiency.
|
 |
|
Note:
Theories of leadership have moved on a
certain amount since the Blake Mouton Grid was originally
proposed. In particular, the context in which leadership occurs
is now seen as an important driver of the leadership style used.
And in many situations, the "Team
Leader" as an ideal has moved to the ideal of the
"Transformational Leader": Someone who, according to leadership
researcher Bernard Bass:
-
Is a model of integrity and
fairness;
-
Sets clear goals;
-
Has high expectations;
-
Encourages;
-
Provides support and
recognition;
-
Stirs people's emotions;
-
Gets people to look beyond
their self-interest; and
-
Inspires people to reach for
the improbable.
So use Blake Mouton as a helpful
model, but don't treat it as an "eternal truth". |
|
 |
Key Points
The Blake Mouton Managerial Grid is a
practical and useful framework that helps you think about your leadership
style. By plotting 'concern for production' against 'concern for people',
the grid highlights how placing too much emphasis in one area at the expense
of the other leads to low overall productivity.
The model proposes that when both people and
production concerns are high, employee engagement and productivity increases
accordingly. This is often true, and it follows the ideas of Theories X and
Y, and other participative management theories.
While the grid does not entirely address the
complexity of "Which leadership style is best?", it certainly provides an
excellent starting place to critically analyze your own performance and
improve your general leadership skills. |